How in the hell did we get here?
Is the reality we face today a surprise?
And if we are, WHY?
…
Where to begin.
We could begin at where we ended with 2021 Special Session, where we would name who, exactly, among the WY Legislature has no constitutional allegiance whatsoever and needs to be completely eliminated by Wyoming voters in every future election, for any office, ever. (Which we have every intention of doing.)
We could also begin by naming specific WY elected officials, across all three branches, that have no comprehension of the Supremacy Clause whatsoever. But to do that we would have to go back, pert-near, to when Wyoming became a state in 1899. But for complete raw honesty, we would also have to go back to when many citizens dropped the ball and ceased to cherish or protect the Supremacy Clause, and simply expected their elected officials to cover and protect that very essential base (and our asses) while we were living our self-absorbed busy and seemingly important lives.
We could also begin by illustrating how America is in the final stage of ‘The Decline of A Nation‘. If we were to do that, we would attempt to show you that we are now, most likely, living in the stage that moves from dependence to bondage, and that the only way out is to walk through that fire – with full unadulterated knowledge that we helped build that fire, as did many generations of ancestors before us.
Lastly we could begin by simply stating that, now that the other shoe has dropped, we should come to terms with the fact that we are now on our own for the most part; that we cannot, and should not, expect our current representatives (almost every single person elected to any office) to protect or save us from the apocalyptic reality of the rule of current law and edict we find ourselves pinned under.
If we did that we would immediately begin making suggestions and lists on: 1) What we could each do individually to peacefully not comply with all things unconstitutional; 2) How to wisely avoid the Biden rat-traps set to ensnare us patriots and lowly citizens, and; 3) How to begin the long arduous task of restoring and fortifying Wyoming back to the role of essential member of a union of States responsible for keeping our constitutional republic accountable and intact.
Chicken or egg?
It really is a chicken or egg kind-of dilemma, hinging how these things are related. Right now we are right back where our Founders started – under the tyrannical power of “kings”. Or in our case, a place-holder king. Backed by an entrenched oligarchy of deep state bureaucratic swamp monsters. That we and our ancestors have been incrementally tolerating for decades. Because of our busy and important lives.
Hell. Let’s just jump right into the middle – the Supremacy Clause:
The Supremacy Clause of The Constitution of the United States (emphasis added)
Article. VI. – Debts, Supremacy, Oaths
All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under
the Confederation.
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.
“This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof;”
shall defined (legal definition)
Shall is an imperative command, usually indicating that certain actions are mandatory…
in pursuance of (defined)
formal
: in order to do (something) or to do what is required by (something)
//The changes will be made in pursuance of the contract.
thereof (defined)
adverb
of or about the thing just mentioned
In plain English: It is mandatory that the laws of the United States are only made to do what is required in the Constitution.
Here’s PROOF that it is as simple as that:
The Federalist 33, Alexander Hamilton: “It will not, I presume, have escaped observation, that it expressly confines this supremacy to laws made pursuant to the constitution; which I mention merely as an instance of caution in the convention; since that limitation would have been to be understood, though it had not been expressed.”
Federalist #78, Alexander Hamilton: “There is no position which depends on clearer principles, than that every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the tenor of the commission under which it is exercised, is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid. To deny this, would be to affirm, that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves; that men acting by virtue of powers, may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid.“
