Saving America

This post is part 4 of our Saving America series.

newspeak  (noos – speek)

n.   Deliberately ambiguous and contradictory language used to mislead and manipulate the public.
n.   A mode of talk by politicians and officials [and political radical ideologues] using ambiguous words to deceive the listener.

[Origins of this word (from Wikipedia):  Newspeak is the fictional language of Oceania, a totalitarian superstate that is the setting of George Orwell’s dystopian 1949 novel entitled, Nineteen Eighty-Four. To meet the ideological requirements of English Socialism (Ingsoc) in Oceania, the ruling Party created Newspeak, a controlled language of simplified grammar and restricted vocabulary, meant to limit the freedom of thought—personal identity, self-expression, free will—that threatens the ideology of the regime of Big Brother and the Party, who have criminalized such concepts into thought-crime as contradictions of Ingsoc orthodoxy.]

On June 26th we posted a Cheat Sheet – Expanded Political Spectrum Diagram (with definitions).  In that post we said, “Why we think this is necessary: During ideological wars radicals bastardize terms and definitions to distort the facts; they don’t want you to know who they really are, and they want you to question and defend who you really are by vomiting accusations grounded in terminology that Americans don’t normally use or are unfamiliar with.”

Since then it has become clear to us that a Newspeak America 2020 Glossary is in order.  We will add to this glossary whenever we come across a new term or a word that has been re-defined by political radicals to distort facts and to create chaos, confusion and division among Americans.  It is crucial to remember that most Americans are unaware of the coded language that radical groups have created and adopted.  We do NOT recommend anyone adopting and/or using the newspeak words or phrases below, but rather use the information to educate oneself and others on the dual-reality purposely being created by radicals to manipulate Americans with the ultimate goal of turning us against each other – most especially in regards to race.

We are beginning this glossary with words with alternative Marxist meaning that we learned from a fascinating article published June 27 at American Thinker, The Russian Origins of Black Neo-Marxism by Gary Gindler.  Mr. Gindler is a prolific writer – many of his articles can be found at American Thinker as well as at his own website Gary Gindler Chronicles.  Jamie Glazov, editor of David Horowitz’s Frontpagemag.com and host of the web TV show The Glazov Gang, recently interviewed Mr. Gindler to discuss his June 27 article.  We are embedding this 18 minute video at the bottom of this page – we highly recommend our readers watch the video to learn how radical leftists are re-defining words to fit their Marxist/communist objective.  It is imperative that Americans understand this newspeak to gain a deeper understanding of the war taking place in our country right now.

Hold cellphones sideways to view table

Word / Phrase	Resource of alternate definition	Alternate definition (emphasized in bold)	Notes or examples
black	The Russian Origins of Black Neo-Marxism by Gary Gindler – an article discussing “the philosophical concepts of Noel Ignatiev, a white American of Russian origin, who is the ideological founding father of numerous radical black movements in America.  The author of this concept was even lucky enough to see his best students — Black Lives Matter (BLM) — in action.“	“The fact is that “black” is, in the interpretation of Ignatiev, a revolutionary Marxist.  All those who do not agree with the Left ideology should, according to Ignatiev, be eliminated. The slogan “All Lives Matter” blurs the concept of the enemy and brings confusion to the minds of revolutionaries.  That is why any mention of “All Lives Matter” (or its version in support of the police — “Blue Lives Matter”) provokes such an acute reaction of the Left. According to Ignatiev, “black” is not the level of pigment in the skin, but the level of adherence to the Marxist doctrine.”	These alternate definitions provided by Ignatiev serve as something like a ‘Marxist decoder ring’.  It is however important to keep in mind that most people are unaware of this Marxist alternate definition of “black”- this would include a large percentage of the throngs of useful idiots protesting in American cities today.  The only people who likely understand this linguistic sleight of hand would be card-carrying Marxists, Communists and Socialists – such as BLM co-founders who’ve publicly identified themselves as “trained Marxists”.
creative provocation	The Russian Origins of Black Neo-Marxism by Gary Gindler – an article discussing the philosophical concepts of Noel Ignatiev	riots and vandalism   Ignatiev said,“The issue is never the issue.  The issue is always the revolution.”	The following might also be examples of “creative provocation” by Marxists in these shocking videos, such as this one, this one and this one, where BLM and antifa protestors harass and assault black police officers with racial slurs.
minority	The Russian Origins of Black Neo-Marxism by Gary Gindler – an article discussing the philosophical concepts of Noel Ignatiev	revolutionaries
racist	When Being Anti-Communist Makes You a Racist – Interview of Gary Gindler by Jamie Glazov on the newspeak created by Marxist philosopher and activist Noel Ignatiev	anticommunism; against communist revolution; against socialist revolution
white	The Russian Origins of Black Neo-Marxism by Gary Gindler – an article discussing the philosophical concepts of Noel Ignatiev	“White” in radical parlance means anyone of any race, creed, nationality, color, sex, or sexual preference who embraces capitalism, free markets, limited government, and American traditional culture and values.” Ignatiev also said, “Eventually white women can breed out, but my feeling is that if you are a white male, you should kill yourself now.  If you are a thoughtful person, with a social consciousness who considers himself white, you will consider suicide.” …”Of course, the primary task for Ignatiev was never the physical extermination of whites.  He was talking about the ideological purification of the “whites” from the principles of private property, individualism, and freedom — all concepts profoundly alien to the Marxists”…	Here is a video of an antifa thug yelling at police officers saying, “You’re perpetuating a system of white supremacy” “You know you’re a parasite so shoot yourselves, suicide is the only way out”
white privilege	The Russian Origins of Black Neo-Marxism by Gary Gindler – an article discussing the philosophical concepts of Noel Ignatiev	“It was he [Ignatiev], a convinced, uncompromising, and resolute communist, who in 1967 proposed the doctrine of “white privilege.” Not as a racial term, but as a somewhat modified Marxist term of the class struggle.  The notorious “eradication of white privileges” is simply the standard Marxist wealth redistribution, expressed in newspeak.”	Here’s a video that illustrates the use of this term by a white female protester yelling at black and white police officers claiming that a black man born w/ “privilege and power” is white. (Because of background noise, we recommend viewing the 2nd video at that link where someone captioned the dialog)

This post is part 3 of our Saving America series.

Use the following diagram and definitions to understand “the left” and “the right” of the political spectrum and how it applies to Americans.

Why we think this is necessary:  During ideological wars radicals bastardize terms and definitions to distort the facts; they don’t want you to know who they really are, and they want you to question and defend who you really are by vomiting accusations grounded in terminology that Americans don’t normally use or are unfamiliar with.

An important layer of political misunderstanding that is easy to overlook is that Americans tend to look at things from an American point of view, whereas non-Americans usually look at things from a European political ideological viewpoint. In comparison to most all other countries, America is a very young country (less than 250 years old), but these ideological wars have been fought for far longer than that.  The monarchy of the Kingdom of England, for example, was founded over ten centuries ago in 927.

Very generally speaking, in America when we speak of the left we are typically referring to the Democrat Party, and when we speak of the right we are referring to the Republican Party and, less often, the Libertarian Party. Independents are purportedly to be somewhere in between Democrats and Republicans. Yes there are smaller, less known parties in the USA, but very seldom actually appear on election ballots.  We are the only country that typically views the left and the right in this way.  The political spectrum from world history is much more expanded.  So when radicals accuse Americans of being ideologues that deserve to be spit upon and beat up, we need to understand the facts of what we are being accused of.  We need to understand this for our own knowledge – not so that we can plead our innocence to people who want to burn our country down.

An example that radicals use to distort perceptions and political classifications in America is the ideology of fascism and fascists: Most leftist radicals today assert that “fascism is on the right” and refer to fascists as the “alt-right”.  Here’s the key to untangling that particular distortion: Fascism is to the right of Marxism and communism, but it is to the left of our Constitutional Republic. The contempt that average Americans feel towards a fascist is completely different from the contempt that a Marxist feels towards a fascist.  Marxists and communists hate fascists because, among other things, they are not far enough to the left.

Another example of ideological distortions is when these radicals declare that “white supremacy” is on the right. Hitler is the most well-known white supremacist on the planet and as everyone knows he was a socialist. Socialism is to the right of Marxism and communism, but it is to the left of our Constitutional Republic.  It is fact that the Klu Klux Klan (KKK) originated and was propagated by the Democrat Party in the USA.  Today’s Democrat Party is to the the right of Marxists and communists, but it is to the left of Republicans.

We strongly believe it’s essential for Americans to be on the same page with one another regarding these terms and definitions.  We are not offering this guide to assist you in civil discourse and political debates with Marxists and communists.  These radicals do not want to have a discussion or even an argument – they want to yell at you, punch you in the head and burn your business to the ground.  Everything that we hold sacred they wish to destroy.  And so this is a battle against evil:  All Americans need to understand who our enemy is, what motivates them, and what their tactics are.  The above examples of their purposeful distortions is one of their tactics of creating division and chaos.

We are not assuming that this cheat sheet is perfect, but it is the best we can offer right now.

Because we now live in times of people and the main stream media arbitrarily changing, swapping or making up new definitions to old words, we are choosing to go with an older hard-copy dictionary.  Unless otherwise noted, all definitions are taken directly from the 1960 International Version of the Funk and Wagnalls Standard Dictionary of the English Language.

 

anarchy 1  Absence of government.  2  Lawless confusion and political disorder.  3  General disorder. (Greek: an = no; archos = leader/chief)

capitalism 1  An economic system in which the means of production and distribution are for the most part privately owned and operated for private profit.  2  The possession and concentration of private capital and its resulting power and influence. (Latin: caput = head)

collectivism The doctrine that people as a whole should own or control the material and means of production, or the spirit which determines production by the masses rather by individuals. (Latin: collecta = a gathering together)

communism 1  A social system in which there is community of goods.  2  A theory of government and social order according to which property and the instruments of production belong to the people and are held as a common trust, the profits arising from all labor to be devoted to the general good.  3  Any social theory that calls for the abolition of private property and control by the community over economic affairs. (Latin: communis = common)

democracy 1  A theory of government which, in its purest form, holds that the state should be controlled by all people, each sharing equally in privileges, duties, and responsibilities and each participating in person in the government, as in the city-states of ancient Greece.  In practice, control is vested in elective officers as representatives, who may be upheld or removed by the people.  2  A government so conducted; a state so governed; the mass of the people. (Greek: demos = people; krateein = rule)

dictator/dictatorship 1  One invested with absolute power, especially in a state in time of emergency.  2  One who dictates or proscribes.  3  In ancient Rome, a chief magistrate with supreme authority, appointed by the Senate in cases of emergency for a term of about six months. (Latin:  dictatus – say/speak)

fascism fascism: Any authoritarian, anti-democractic, anti-communist system of government in which economic control by the state, militaristic nationalism, propaganda, and the crushing of opposition by means of secret police emphasize the supremacy of the state over the individual; Fascism: The system of one party government, developed by the Fascisti in Italy [under Mussolini], which exercised a centralized autocractic control over the activities of all individuals, especially through the economic agency of state corporations. (Latin: fasciculus = a bundle)

liberalism 1  An attitude toward social, economic, political, and ecclesiastical policies, favoring gradual reform and ordered change rather than reaction or revolution and opposed equally to arbitrary censorship and undue license in dealing with ideas.  2  A doctrine often equated in laissez-faire economics [the let-alone principal; absolutely uncontrolled industrial and commercial competition; noninterference] , holding to free trade and to minimum interference by the state with economic activities. (Latin:  liber = free)

libertarianism A theory of government which holds that the state is subordinate to the individual.  It may range from extreme anarchism to pure democracy. (Latin:  liber = free)

Marxism The body of doctrine formulated by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in systematic form, including economic determinism, class conflicts leading inevitably to revolution in the transition from capitalism and thence to communism under the dictatorship of the proletariat [lower class, lowest in class systems, indigents, etc.], and the predicted ultimate triumph of world communism as a result of destructive rivalries among the capitalist-imperialist powers.

monarchy 1  Government by a monarch [king or emperor]; sovereign control.  2  A government or territory ruled by a monarch.  A government in which the power and prerogative of the sovereign are limited by constitutional provisions. (Greek: monos = a unit; alone)

oligarchy A form of government in which supreme power is restricted to a few. (Greek:  oligos = few; archein = rule.)

republic 1   a state in which sovereignty resides in the people or in a certain portion of the people, and the legislative and administrative powers are lodged in officers elected by and representing the people; a representative democracy: applied to almost every form of government except kingdoms, empires and dictatorships.  2  A community of persons working freely in or devoted to the same cause. (Latin: res = thing; publica = public)

socialism Public collective ownership or control of the basic means of production, distribution, and exchange, with the avowed aim of operating for use rather than for profit, and of assuring to each member of society an equitable share of goods, services and welfare benefits: as a system of social and economic organization planned, attempted or achieved through various methods… The definition goes on to explain different types of socialism, including; Utopian, Christian, Guild, Fabian/British Labour Party, and Marxist-Leninist State. (Latin: socialis = ally)

totalitarianism Designating or characteristic of a government controlled exclusively by one party or faction, which suppresses all opposition and criticism and controls and regiments all social, cultural and economic activity in the country to advance its political aims. (Latin: totalis = all)

This post is part 2 of our Saving America series.

In our post on June 7 (What Just Happened?!), acknowledging the killing of George Floyd and the subsequent nationwide protests, riots and violence, we stated that “In the coming weeks we will be sharing some material to read and watch – as our effort offered to Wyomingites to assist in educating and understanding what we now see happening to our country”.

Well, we’ve been putting a lot of thought into how to begin that journey.  Do we begin with a diagram/video that illustrates the political spectrum, or do we post approximately 130 minutes of video entitled, The Bloody History of Communism?  Do we begin by talking about ‘the fundamental transformation of the United States of America’ that Obama promised fourteen years ago, or do we listen to Dr. Jordan Peterson describe the history and psychology of Identity Politics and the Marxist Lie of White Privilege?  Do we share a video on who is Antifa, or do we share information that explains why they are calling average Americans fascists? Do we delve into the psychology of group think, or cognitive dissonance, or the scientific findings of the 1971 Stanford Prison Experiment?  Do we embed a podcast that explains (with many current examples of) Saul Alinsky’s Marxist-inspired book Rules for Radicals (with a dedication to Lucifer), or do we post a video about the Four Stages of Ideological Subversion explained by Russian defector and former Soviet journalist and KGB informant Yuri Bezmenov?

If we are going to effectively and successfully fight to save our country, we believe all of the above subjects (and more) need to be delved into to understand how and why our country seems to be coming apart at the seams.  What we learn, we must share and pass on – especially with younger generations, who are being educated with progressive filters being put on historical facts.  (Actually, there is a lot more info regarding the youth of America being recruited and trained specifically for the uprisings we are seeing today.  We know.  That sounds pretty far-fetched.  By consistently proving our research with open-source data, we hope we have earned our reader’s trust to prove this point, in a multitude of ways, in one of our next articles.)

The conundrum, for some, is that sharing any of the above mentioned info cannot be done in the advised 50 characters at Facebook, or 280 characters or less at Twitter.  The irony is that even it could be effectively done in the proscribed amount of characters for any given social media platform, the truth is that it would most likely be tagged and squelched for being fake news, hate language, promoting violent images or whatever new damning classifications that are being pinned on rational people during these irrational times.  This is because some of the most popular social media platforms that many Americans use numerous times a day, have turned on their clients – and are now suppressing free speech of the masses.  It makes one really wonder how this will affect the outcome of our elections this fall.

What would Thomas Paine do?  He’d be inking up the presses and getting to work to get the word out on his own – that’s exactly what he would do.  And as Americans, we must do the same – it’s our duty to be ever vigilant and to defend this great nation.  And so, some of us have some catching up to do.  Be forewarned, this journey of education will not be slow-paced.

So let’s jump right in and take a stark look at the truth of what is happening right now – on our home soil.

Just a few weeks ago most Americans were concerned with the Covid19 pandemic and the subsequent government imposed lock-downs – and the economic fallout from both.  Here in Wyoming, many were also, and still are, reeling from an oil bust – and the subsequent unemployment from that.

And then, on late May 25th, we all watched in shock and horror on our computers and TVs, the slow, tortured annihilation of a handcuffed black man pinned to the ground by two Minneapolis police officers – and with a third officer jamming a fatal knee into his neck.

His name was George Floyd.

Following Mr. Floyd’s death, protests began popping up across the USA.  Protests began popping up in Europe.  And some of the protests here in America turned into violence, riots, looting, arson and more death.  The count is up to seventeen Americans who have died from the violence so far.

Everyone knows that the media has been downplaying the riots and subsequent deaths – if they even acknowledge them at all.  In the coming weeks we will be sharing some material to read and watch – as our effort offered to Wyomingites to assist in educating and understanding what we now see happening to our country.  Meanwhile we offer the video below of Judge Jeanine Pirro, from June 6th, who explains the tragedy of what happened to Mr. Floyd, the legalities and the fallout playing out before our eyes at this time.

Judge Jeanine Opener June 6, 2020